A trend widget shows whether technical work is improving the site or creating new debt.
Find the SEO fires before they spread.
Run technical crawls, spot indexation problems, prioritize fixes, and keep a history your team can defend in reviews.
Catch the problem, prove the impact, ship the fix.
Each feature turns messy SEO work into clear signals, decisions, and actions that are easier to explain, assign, and prove.
Technical audits only matter when they protect retainers.
Turn crawl noise into a fix list your team can actually assign, track, and explain.
Find indexation blockers, render risk, broken templates, internal-link problems, and technical debt before performance drops.
Keep historical proof so every review can show what improved, what still matters, and why the next fix is worth doing.
The questions teams ask before switching.
What the workflow replaces, what it helps prove, what spends credits, and how the work moves forward after the signal appears.
What does a site audit help us decide?
It turns crawl data into priorities: what is broken, which templates are affected, what should be fixed first, and what proof the team can show after the work ships.
What changes compared with handing someone a crawl export?
A crawl export still leaves the team to interpret hundreds of rows. Page Optimized is meant to surface the issue, show affected URLs, group the pattern, attach context, and turn the problem into work someone can actually assign.
Can agencies use it for prospecting audits?
Yes. Projects are flexible, so teams can run audits for active sites or prospects. Fresh crawls spend credits; saved audit results reopen for 0 credits.
Does it include JavaScript render checks and URL inspection?
HTML crawls, URL inspections, issue history, sitemap movement, structured data checks, and fix context all sit inside the audit workflow. Pages whose content only appears after JavaScript runs are detected and flagged as render risk — the crawler reads served HTML, so it tells you what a crawler sees rather than executing the page.
Will it tell us what to fix first?
That is the point. Audit work should separate critical issues from noise, identify repeated templates, show impact, and help the team choose the next fix instead of treating every warning equally.
Can we prove what changed after fixes ship?
Yes. Saved crawl history, issue snapshots, and comparison views make it easier to show what improved, what still matters, and why the next round of work is worth doing.
What spends credits in site audits?
Fresh HTML crawls, URL inspections, and other new audit runs spend credits. Reopening a saved audit, issue list, fix packet, or report-ready view costs 0 credits.
Does this replace Screaming Frog?
For many day-to-day agency workflows, the goal is yes: crawl, prioritize, explain, assign, and report from one workspace. Some teams may still keep specialist crawl tools for unusual edge cases, but Page Optimized is built to own the operating workflow.