Module 07

Links, authority, and reputation

Improve internal discovery, earn relevant references, and monitor public claims without buying signals or manufacturing mentions.

Site owners
SEO specialists
PR teams
Agencies

Module case file

Horizon Legal needs stronger reference paths, not a bigger link count

The site has 218 referring domains, broken internal paths to case-result pages, and claims that must be consistent across owned and third-party sources.

Backlink snapshot: 218 referring domains
Internal problem: 12 links point to 404 URLs
Priority page: /personal-injury/austin/
Risk boundary: No paid or manipulative link schemes

Lesson 7.1

Build useful internal paths

Connect related pages with descriptive, contextual links.

Why this matters

Internal links help users continue a task and help crawlers discover and contextualize pages. More links are not automatically better.

Build yours

Find important orphan or weakly linked pages.
Choose relevant source pages.
Write descriptive anchor text in useful context.
Fix broken and redirected internal links.
Recheck crawl paths after release.

Completed example: Horizon Legal

Internal-path repair plan

The plan fixes broken paths and improves useful discovery in the same pass.

Finished output

Broken paths: 12 links to retired case-result URLs
Replacement: Current case-results hub or relevant surviving result
Priority path: Austin hub -> injury service -> calculator -> consultation
Acceptance: No 404 target; anchor accurately describes destination

Before you move on

Every link helps a user continue.
Anchor text describes the destination.
Broken destinations are fixed at the source.

Lesson 7.2

Read a backlink profile carefully

Use backlink estimates for comparison and investigation, not as a universal authority score.

Why this matters

Backlink indexes are incomplete models. Review relevant referring pages, link context, destination, movement, and risk rather than reporting one proprietary score as truth.

Build yours

Confirm target scope.
Review referring domains and destination distribution.
Inspect new, lost, broken, and suspicious patterns.
Compare relevant competitors with the same provider and scope.

Completed example: Horizon Legal

Backlink profile interpretation

A profile is read by relevance and destination, not reduced to one authority score.

Finished output

Snapshot: 218 referring domains
Review segments: Local organizations, legal references, directories, press, spam
Destination gap: Austin service page has fewer relevant references than the firm homepage
Risk: Do not infer quality from domain count alone

Actual product

Connect link evidence to the pages that need it

PageOptimized keeps backlink movement, broken links, target pages, and outreach state inside the project.

Full size Open product

Open full size

Set target scope.
Inspect referring pages and destinations.
Find a useful opportunity or repair.
Track the relationship and outcome.

Before you move on

Provider and scope are named.
Quality is reviewed at page level.
A modeled score is not called Google's authority metric.

Lesson 7.3

Earn references with real utility

Create reasons for relevant people and publications to cite or recommend the site.

Why this matters

Original data, tools, expert explanations, resources, reporting, and community participation can deserve references. Paying for ranking links or automating irrelevant outreach creates risk and weak relationships.

Build yours

Choose a genuinely useful asset or contribution.
Identify relevant sources and audiences.
Personalize outreach around their work and reader value.
Track replies, decisions, and earned outcomes.
Disclose sponsorships and qualify paid or user-generated links correctly.

Completed example: Horizon Legal

Reference-worthy asset brief

The asset earns attention by being useful, not by disguising an exchange.

Finished output

Asset: Texas injury claim timeline and document checklist
Audience: Injured residents, local advocates, legal-information publishers
Utility: Printable timeline, source-backed deadlines, evidence checklist
Outreach: Relevant organizations with a genuine reason to reference it

Before you move on

The pitch has reader value.
Target relevance is documented.
Compensation and link attributes are handled honestly.

Lesson 7.4

Monitor claims and reputation

Compare what the organization says with what independent sources currently report.

Why this matters

A mention is not automatically positive, accurate, or influential. Track claims, source, date, support, contradiction, and the appropriate response.

Build yours

Maintain approved brand facts and effective dates.
Collect important third-party claims.
Classify supported, outdated, contradicted, or unknown.
Correct owned sources first and handle external corrections respectfully.
Record what changed after outreach.

Completed example: Horizon Legal

Claim and reputation register

Each material claim has a canonical source and review owner.

Finished output

Claim: Office locations and service areas
Canonical source: Approved firm location record
Surfaces checked: Website, business profiles, legal directories, answer engines
Review cadence: Quarterly and after any office change

Before you move on

Facts have owners and dates.
Sources are not treated equally without context.
The response does not attempt to manufacture consensus.

Primary references

Verify the practice at the source.

Practices and source links reviewed August 2026.

Google Search CentralSEO Starter Guide Google Search CentralSpam policies for Google web search